Thursday, May 28, 2009

In The News: La. House OKs Hand-Held Cell Ban For Motorists


Using a hand-held cell phone while driving should be illegal in Louisiana, punishable with a $100 fine for a first offense, under a measure approved by the Louisiana House.

The 57-41 vote on Wednesday sends Rep. Austin Badon's bill to the Senate, which killed a similar bill last year. The measure would have no effect on the use of hands-free phones.
Article Controls

House members watered down Badon's measure slightly, by making the use of hand-held cell phones a "secondary offense," meaning a police officer could not pull someone over for that violation alone. Instead, a motorist could face the fine if pulled over for speeding, lane violation or another primary offense.

Badon, D-New Orleans, argued that handling a phone while driving is too much of a distraction for too many drivers. He overcame opposition from lawmakers including Rep. Barbara Norton, who complained that the bill would do nothing to reduce distracted driving caused by motorists eating, applying makeup, adjusting neckties or tuning a radio while driving.

"What is the difference if you're holding a cell phone or a bottle of water, or a cup of coffee?" said Norton, D-Shreveport.

The bill includes numerous exceptions in case of an emergency, so a motorist could call 911, a hospital, doctor's office, fire department or police station while driving.

A second offense would bring a $150, increasing by $50 for further offenses, up to $250. The measure would take effect in January.

In The News: Some Sobering Stats On Texting While Driving


On the one hand, I love texting on my iPhone. My wife and I often send each other text messages when she’s in a meeting at work, or I’m on a conference call at home. We don’t bother each other, but still get the message.

On the other hand, I hate texting, especially when it’s being done by someone behind the wheel of a car (or a Green Line trolley in Boston, but more on that below).

From the urban dictionary: “Text-end: When a text-messaging-distracted driver rear-ends the vehicle in front of [him]….”

True story: About three months ago, I pulled up to a stop sign in Falls Church, Va., near where I live. A young woman in a sporty car pulled up beside me. As she pulled up, I noticed she was texting on a cellphone, barely paying attention to what was happening around her. She continued to text through the stop sign and right up to the next stoplight. My car was still next to hers, so I rolled down my window and motioned to her. She looked puzzled and rolled hers down as well. I told her that she was endangering the life of every single person on the road if she continued to text while driving. Her reply was somewhat expected. She made a rude gesture with a certain digit and roared away when the light turned.

Driving while texting (DWT) is becoming a real problem. A real and dangerous problem. It’s bad enough that people can’t seem to stop themselves from talking on cellphones while driving. (Raise your hand if you’ve almost been hit by someone talking on his or her cellphone while driving. I see, almost everyone.) But at least cellphone talkers could pay some attention to the road. Not so with those DWT.

In a survey released last week by Vlingo Corp., a Cambridge, Mass., company that develops speech-recognition technology for mobile phones (and so, of course with a vested interest in the survey’s outcome, so keep that in mind), more than 26 percent of some 4,800 cellphone users surveyed across the United States admitted they had sent text messages while driving. The worst state was Tennessee, where 42 percent of those surveyed said they had done DWT.

But here is the kicker: While more than 26 percent of those surveyed said they texted while driving, 83 percent said the practice should be illegal. (Currently seven states and the District of Columbia outlaw it.) So if my math is correct, this means that at least 9 percent of those surveyed text even though they think it’s a bad thing.

Ah, humans. The spirit is willing, but the thumbs are twitchy.

It’s likely the 17 percent who said it should not be illegal are between the ages of 18 and 29. According to a Pew Research Center study last year, 74 percent of Americans in this age group use text messaging. A lot. And DWT does seem to be inversely proportional to the age of the driver – the younger you are, the more likely you are to do it. The Vlingo study found that 58 percent of teenagers did it, as did 49 percent of those aged 20 to 29. A little more than 13 percent of those aged 50-59 did so.

But it’s no joke. And the bigger the vehicle your driving, the greater the danger. Just ask the people who were on the Boston Green Line trolley that smashed into the back of another one recently. At the time of the accident, the driver was texting his girlfriend, he admitted. Dozens were injured, the driver lost his job, and the MBTA said it would ban on-the-job cellphone use and fire anyone caught using a cellphone, pager, or similar device during working hours.

But at least no one was killed in that accident. The same is not true of the horrific accident last September in California when, it is speculated, a train operator may have missed a stop signal because he was texting shortly before the accident.

Last year, Mark Melrose of Mountainside Hospital in Montclair, N.J., a spokesman for the American College of Emergency Physicians, told USA Today that most people probably don’t initiate text messages while driving, but find it hard not to respond if they receive one.

“It’s hard to ignore the temptation,” he said. “You think, ‘Tthis might be important, I’d better check.’ You know you shouldn’t be doing it, but you do it anyway.”

It’s time for the other 43 states to act. No texting of any kind, even (sorry Vlingo) speech texting, which still quadruples your chances of having an accident. But making laws isn’t the complete answer. Yes, it might stop older people from doing it. But I also think we need to attack DWT the way we attacked smoking, or drinking and driving. We have to deprive it of its coolness factor for young people.

Making it seem as stupid and dangerous as it really is will save a lot more lives than just saying in an adult voice, “Now kids, don’t you do that!”

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

In The News: Behind The Wheel


If you spend a large chunk of the day behind the wheel for business, as a teenager taxi service or just for the sheer pleasure of it, eventually your mobile phone becomes a temptation that's difficult to resist, whether it's ringing on the seat next to you or you have remembered an urgent call you need to make.

Of course, talking on a mobile phone while driving is not only dangerous ut against the law, so let's look at some alternatives.

A wired headset is cheap and effective, although often messy, while the loudspeaker mode on mobiles vary depending on the volume and quality of the speaker.

If your mobile supports Bluetooth, the best solution is to make the most of this and go wireless.

Bluetooth is a short-range (roughly 10 metres) wireless technology with built-in security and low power requirements that makes it ideal for mobile-phone activities, such as sending contact details to another handset, beaming photos to a PC, or one of the more popular uses, which is "pairing", or connecting to a hands-free speakerphone car kit.

Bluetooth speakerphone solutions come in all shapes and sizes, ranging from basic plug-and-play models with a simple speaker and microphone that attach to a vehicle's cigarette lighter up to units professionally fitted into the dashboard with a touch-screen display and full integration with the vehicle's sound system.

While the additional features found on some models are useful, the basic function all Bluetooth speakerphones provide is to wirelessly transfer the sound to and from a Bluetooth-enabled mobile phone, whether it's in your pocket, on the passenger's seat or even in a briefcase in the boot.

Once a secure connection has been made, incoming calls can be answered as well as making calls without having to touch your mobile phone.

Some of the other features Bluetooth speakerphones offer include caller ID, voice dialling and last-number redialling, and transmitting the audio from the phone to a spare FM radio frequency for improved quality, which also means if there's digital music stored on the mobile, this can also be heard through the car's stereo system.

When it comes to performance there are only a few key areas to look at. First and foremost, the product's speaker and microphone determine the sound quality of calls, and with the general noise inside a moving vehicle, the louder and clearer the speaker is, the better.

Another point is how well the built-in technology works that's designed to reduce vehicle noise, background voices and unwanted echo effects (such as hearing your own voice) during calls.

Extra features, form factor and general ease of use are also important to consider when choosing the right Bluetooth hands-free speakerphone to suit your needs.

In The News: Bluetooth Communications Devices That Make Canadian Driving Safer


With the upcoming restrictions on using cell phones and handheld devices for drivers in Ontario, it's time to rethink how you're going to handle your hands-free needs.

The Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association (CWTA) reports that the new legislation, which is expected to come into effect this fall, means you will no longer be able to hold a phone to your head or use handheld devices for entertainment, emailing or texting while driving. GPS systems however can still be used if they're attached to the dashboard.

"It all boils down to common sense," says Marc Choma, director of communications for CWTA. "We're not opposed to hands free. We're looking at making the roads safer and eliminating distractions."

For those that can't live without their communications lifeline on the roads, there's a whole range of Bluetooth wireless, wired, voice activation and speaker phone technologies for safe, hands-free communications - from high-end speaker systems for audio/technophiles, to the more practical offerings for the occasional user.

"The Bluetooth space has expanded and now offers lots of options to meet the legislation and can support all price ranges," says Judy Mellett director of devices and accessories for Telus. "Many come with advanced control functions so you don't have to press the keypad to change the volume. Noise cancellation has also improved a lot."

In addition to improved sound quality and noise cancellation, some newer headsets now come with a quick charge feature that allows you to get five hours of talk time after a 15 minute charge.

Mellett says that over the last two years the industry has made it easier for drivers to comply since most handheld devices now come standard with a wired headset. Voice activated dialing is also a big help in keeping your hands on the wheel where they belong.

Those with a bigger budget and hours to log on the road can always opt for an in-car speaker system that connects to your FM radio and speaker system. Richard Lee, country sales manager for Nokia Original Accessories, car kits do cost more and in some cases there is an installation fee involved. "But they're ideal for someone who is in the car a lot."

As technology improves, speaker systems are also gaining popularity for the non-headset crowd. There is range of Bluetooth car kits that offer different mounting options, including a visor clip, suction cup or friction pad for mounting on the dashboard. Of course you can always use the speaker on the phone itself - as long as it's one button.

When selecting your hands-free device of choice, keep in mind your needs when you're out of the car. For example, it's easy to carry on using your Bluetooth headset when you're moving about on foot. Car speaker phones can also be used on the desktop.

Whatever the choice says Julie Smithers, associate director of media relations for Bell Canada, "The quality of speaker phones and wired headsets - and the price points - are constantly improving. The key is picking products that ensure you are keeping focused on the road at all times."

"Everybody's ears, budgets and style choices are different," says Lee. "But when it comes to hands-free options, there is definitely something for everyone."

Cool Stuff: CallView Name Display Bluetooth Carkit



The CallView is a Bluetooth Hands-free communication device with Caller-ID & Name Display. There is no other device that compares to its features & clarity while in a conversation. No installation is required & it simply attaches to your cars visor for hands-free accessibility & easy overhead viewing. Our top of the line product at a price that's unbelievable

You can use this device in your vehicle, truck, office or at home & it offers capabilities to use MSN, Skype and other internet messaging programs (user must have a Bluetooth Dongle ready for their PC.)

Please note: In order to have name display on the car kit, your mobile phone must have a Bluetooth push feature for your address book. You simply send all your contacts from your mobile phone via Bluetooth to the CallView Car Kit & when someone calls you, their name will show up. If you do not have this feature, you will still have Caller-ID.

Features include: Loud built-in speaker, clear built-in microphone, built in DSP for noise & echo cancellation, compatible with ANY Bluetooth phone, adjustable visor mount, backlit screen & keys for easy viewing, replaceable lithium-ion battery, built in phonebook.



Monday, May 25, 2009

In The News: Go Back to Drawing Board with Bills Restricting Cell Phone use

Texans as a general rule don't like the government telling them what they can and can't do, even if it may be for their own good.

Latest case in point: State lawmakers are trying to push through an assortment of bills banning Texans from talking on their cell phones while they're driving.

For starters, they're targeting teenagers, which may make senses, but equal attention should be focused on adult drivers as well.

Unfortunately, limiting cell phone use by teens appears to be as far as the Texas Legislature is willing to go this session. The scattershot approach to the issue may be part of the problem with getting legislation approved. There are proposals to:

-Prohibit only teens from talking on their cell phones while driving;

- Ban the use of cell phones only in school zones;

- Make it illegal for all people to talk on the phone while driving on any Texas road.

"People seem to forget driving on the roads of the state of Texas is privilege, not a right," said Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer, D-San Antonio. "Talking on the cell phone and text messaging while driving are probably two things we shouldn't encourage people to do in the state and it is unfortunate we can't have that debate on the House floor."

His point is well-taken, considering the results of a study conducted by the Center for Risk Studies at Harvard University. It showed 6 percent of motor vehicle accidents are caused by people driving while using a wireless phone. That's the equivalent of 2,600 deaths and 12,000 injuries a year.

The Harvard study explains why the National Safety Council, which was chartered by Congress, is recommending states ban cell phones while driving - even hand-free phones.

Talking on a cell phone while driving isn't the only serious distraction you can see in Lubbock every day.

Motorists are risking injury to themselves or others by listening to music too loud, applying makeup, eating food, and juggling a cup of hot coffee or a cold soda.

Texting while behind the wheel, however, leads the list of preventable hazards as it demands more concentration than any of the others.

"What are you going to do with other distractions?" asks Joe Pickett Pickett, D-El Paso, chairman of the House Transportation Committee, the 11-member panel assigned to screen such legislation.

It's clear to us state lawmakers need to go back to the drawing board on this matter for more discussion, debate, and resolution - even if it's not during this session, which ends June 1.

There's some good ideas here, but they're scattered in so many different bills it's impossible to predict if their effect would be meaningful if approved.

Something needs to be done to address the problem, not only with teens but with all drivers - whether it's now or when the next session convenes in 2011. We're still a long way from where we need to be in terms of public safety on the highways.

In The News: 60% of Teens Drive While Texting, Despite Knowing Dangers


Another day, another study -- it seems like every time we turn around, there's another body of research revealing that, even though they know it's dangerous, stupid, and should be illegal, teens still text-message while driving.

The latest study paints a slightly rosier picture than the last one we saw (which said that 85-percent of teenage girls and almost 60 percent of boys were guilty of driving-while-texting).The survey -- conducted by research firm Toluna on behalf of voice-recognition company Vlingo -- found that 60-percent of teens admitted to texting at the wheel. It's not just kids that are guilty, though, since 26-percent of all users surveyed said that they do it too.

83-percent of respondents agreed that driving-while-texting (or, DWT, as many people are calling it) should be illegal. Whether it's legal or not, DWT is obviously very dangerous. Sadly, if these studies are any indication, it's clear that people probably wont stop tapping out messages while they're switching lanes. Maybe we'll start taking the train to work.

In The News: Technology to Stop Phone use in Cars Flawed

SALT LAKE CITY - Many parents would love to be able to give their teenagers a cell phone that couldn't be used while driving. Now some inventors say they have come up with ways to make that possible, but they appear to be relying on wishful thinking.

One product to hit the market, $10-a-month software by Dallas-based WQN Inc., can disable a cell phone while its owner is driving. It uses GPS technology, which can tell how fast a person is traveling. But it can't know whether the person is driving — and therefore it can needlessly lock a phone. WQN, which sells cell phone and Internet security software under the name WebSafety, says it signed up about 50 customers for its first month of service.

Aegis Mobility, a Canadian software company, plans to release a similar Global Positioning System-based product this fall, known as DriveAssistT. Aegis is in talks with big U.S. wireless phone carriers, which would have to support the software and charge families a fee of probably $10 to $20 a month, said David Teater, the company's vice president.

In The News: State's Ban on Cell Phones while Driving has meant Thousands of Fines


New Jersey transportation officials say a year-old state law banning cell phone use while driving has resulted in nearly 109,000 summonses issued in the past 11 months.

That's almost double the amount of tickets handed out during the previous five years for the offense.

A state law signed on March 1 last year makes talking on hand-held cell phones while driving a primary offense. That means police are now able to stop motorists just for talking on the phone.

Division of Highway Safety director Pam Fischer said the primary law is making a difference, resulting in about 10,000 tickets a month.

New Jersey is among four states and the District of Columbia that have made using a cell phone while driving a primary offense.

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Cool Stuff: Car Mount with Picture Frame




Available for less then $14.00 shipped within the USA

Cool Stuff: iPhone COMPLETE Hands-Free & FM Transmitter




For more on this product you can check out CanadaDriveSafe.com

In The News: Driver Attending to Cell Phone hits Police Car


A man was apparently texting on his cell phone Tuesday when he ran into the back of a stopped St. Joseph police patrol car, knocked it into another squad car and sent two police officers to the hospital, police said.

The accident occurred after police stopped southbound traffic on Interstate 29 to work a one-car accident.

The man sped around stopped semi-trucks and ran into the patrol car, police said. He was arrested on an unrelated warrant. The officers suffered minor injuries.

In The News: Rock Springs Weighs Ban on Phones While Driving

ROCK SPRINGS, Wyo. (AP) - An ordinance that would ban drivers from talking on their cell phones is moving ahead in Rock Springs.

The Rock Springs City Council plans to hold a final reading of the proposed ordinance on Tuesday. The council will act on the proposal after that.

The prohibition would cover talking on cell phones in addition to text messaging, taking photographs and any other use that diverts a driver's attention. The ordinance would not apply to police and operators of emergency vehicles.

Violators of the ordinance could face a fine of up to $750 and up to six months in jail.

In The News: Texting Ban in New York


ELMIRA - If you're a fan of texting while driving, you might have to break that habit.

Some members of the New York State Assembly laid out their plans on Tuesday to officially ban texting while driving.

The bill would prevent drivers from writing, sending, or reading text messages on a cell phone. It also creates a plan to educate new drivers on the dangers of driving and texting.

Some people we spoke with say it makes sense, especially since it's already against the law to talk on your cell phone and drive.

“People aren't supposed to be talking on cell phones, but you see it all the time, even with police around. No I don't think it will be a deterrent, but it will be a good attempt at hopefully stopping it,” says Roxanne Whiting from Elmira.

“It's dangerous just to be able to talk on the phone and drive. Why should you be able to text? You have to concentrate on putting the letters in and everything. It doesn't make sense,” says Kenneth Groves from Elmira.

There are 62 counties in New York that have already banned texting while driving, including Schuyler County. But the Assembly Members want to make things uniform across New York.

A similar bill passed in the State Senate last year, but never came up for a vote in the Assembly.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Right Up: Still Talking, With Hands at 10 and 2


INCREASINGLY, it is the law of the land. But it is also just common sense: Driving while holding a cellphone is a lousy idea.

Six states, including New York and New Jersey, as well as the District of Columbia, have banned holding a cellphone while driving and, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 23 more state governments are considering similar bans.

Such laws do not prohibit talking on a cellphone — only that you use a hands-free device (usually an earpiece or a speakerphone accessory) so that both hands stay on the wheel. Of course, some studies suggest that banning hand held cellphones while driving does not go far enough — that maintaining any phone conversation is too distracting for the driver.

But if the proliferation of people randomly bursting into monologues on city streets is any indication, many people prefer hands-free communication even when they’re on foot. Some of that growth is linked to legislation, some to lower prices, but another factor is the evolution of hands-free technology that has yielded better sound quality and stronger privacy measures.

Hands-free devices are generally split into two categories: earpieces and speakerphone units. Because they can be used behind the wheel or while walking (or cooking, or gardening), earpieces have been far more popular.

Early Bluetooth accessories suffered from a dreaded malady known as “pairing syndrome.” In order to establish a wireless connection to your handset, an earpiece or speakerphone would trade codes over the air. This often led to repeated code inputs on the part of the owner, as the pairing process was about as unreliable as could be. Common side effects included high-decibel profanity, increased blood pressure and hurling the device across the room.

Fortunately, most new Bluetooth accessories “auto pair.” You may need to enter the code the first time, but you do it just once. After that, the device will remember the secret handshake and pair up with your handset automatically.

Bluetooth earpieces have also improved in sound quality. Earpieces like the Aliph Jawbone Prime ($130), the BlueAnt Q1 ($130) and the Jabra BT530 ($80) all use multiple microphones. While their specific technologies differ, the principle is the same: One microphone sits by your mouth to pick up your voice while another sits higher on the earpiece to pick up ambient audio. Using some fancy software, the earpiece determines which sound is your voice and then filters out the background noise.

The Sound ID 300 ($120) has three settings, each increasing the frequency range in which people most commonly lose their hearing as they age. It also will automatically adjust the volume when the environmental noise changes.

The Q1 takes a short list of voice commands, so it will announce the number calling and users can just say “answer” to take the call. The only hitch is that users must memorize the precise phrases required for it to act on the commands.

But in spite of the capabilities of earpieces, some people just do not want them. For them, speakerphone accessories provide a true hands- (and body-) free option. These devices can clip to a car’s sun visor or protrude from the cigarette lighter plug. Usually called “car kits,” these sets don’t do as well sorting out voice from noise, but because of the larger size, they can incorporate features not often found in headsets.

The Motorola T505 Motorokr, which costs $140, does its best to provide many of the same features found in factory-installed systems in new cars. Using an onboard FM transmitter, it will play incoming calls over a car’s speakers, and it can play music files from a phone with stereo Bluetooth. If you don’t need the music-playing features, consider Motorola’s other speakerphone, the T305, which costs $70.

Some Bluetooth kits offer text-to-speech and voice command, like the BlueAnt Supertooth 3, which costs $100. The Supertooth loads contacts from your phone when it links. When a known contact calls, the Supertooth speaks the name aloud (albeit in a somewhat robotic voice). If the caller is unknown, it speaks the phone number. Through the limited voice commands available, “yes” accepts the call, or “ignore” sends it to voice mail. The device can also redial the last number called on command.

Of course, if you are buying a new car, the choice of a hands-free device may have been made for you. Various makers have their own factory-installed systems, which tend to have the most advanced features. Ford autos (including Lincolns and Mercurys) use the Sync system, a collaboration with Microsoft. Sync links to a cellphone and adds voice recognition software to control the handset through verbal commands. It also uses a synthesized voice to read incoming e-mail messages aloud. All of the sound comes through the stereo system, which mutes music when there is an incoming call.

“Anyone who has used an integrated system in a new car would say that is their favorite and highest quality,” said Mike Foley, the executive director of the Bluetooth Special Interest Group, which sets engineering standards for Bluetooth devices.

Some — even most — of these features are available in aftermarket Bluetooth hands-free devices. The features can even be integrated into a car’s existing sound system, but the aftermarket parts are expensive and installation frequently runs an additional several hundred dollars. By comparison, when Ford’s Sync system is bought as an option, it’s $400.

If legislation doesn’t compel you to go hands-free now, you might want to wait. This month the engineering group that controls Bluetooth is setting a new standard that will improve handsets’ sound and reliability. But to take advantage of the new standard, you’ll need new gear — and that gear is not expected to hit stores until the end of the year.

In The News: How to stop the gabbing driver?


CORPUS CHRISTI — Persuading Corpus Christi residents to hang up and drive could be harder than anticipated for a committee considering a cell phone ban for drivers.

Just ask them. They tried to stop talking while driving, with mixed results.

Only two of six members of the Transportation Safety Advisory Committee said they were able to break their own talking-while-driving habit a month after they first discussed banning cell phone use while driving.

So even though most of the committee members said they think cell phone use while driving is dangerous, they’re not sure what they can do.

“It’s a hard habit to break,” committee member Glenn Jones said. “Even those calls I took could have waited. But I don’t know if the political will is there. I don’t know if we can get support.”

Instead of forwarding a recommendation on the rule to the City Council, the committee will evaluate other ways to regulate cell phone use in cars,

The city could set a policy for its own employees that prohibits cell phone use and the city may ask other companies to set up similar policies, There is also an idea to increase traffic violation fines if the driver was seen using a cell phone while committing an offense. Cell phone use was listed as a contributing factor in 30 of the 12,024 car accidents in the city from January 2008 until last month, or less than 1 percent of accidents. Cell phone use is self-reported, so if drivers tells an accident investigator that they weren’t on the phone, it won’t be listed as a factor.

Of the 27 accidents in that time that resulted in a death, three were because of cell phone use, about 11 percent of the cases.

Progress on the rule could be slow. Committee Chairman Bill Green said he wanted to make sure the city studied how any rule could be enforced to effectively curb the habit.

“If we step too far out on this too early, we may undermine our efforts,” he said. “We can find some form of remedy that improves the situation. We are just trying to catch up with technology.”

But some committee members doubted if cell phone use distracted drivers any more than other activities, such as eating, applying makeup or disciplining unruly children.

“I can think of numerous distractions we could nitpick on,” committee member Curtis Rock said. “Prohibiting cell phones now. What’s next? I think that I’ve been able to use a cell phone in the car just fine. We can sit here and think of every single distraction imaginable.”

There is a potential for statewide regulation of cell phone use in cars. The Legislature is considering several bills addressing use of cell phones while driving, including limiting use to hands-free devices, restricting use in school zones or doubling fines for traffic offenses if a cell phone also is in use. Another bill, filed by state Rep. Solomon Ortiz Jr., D- Corpus Christi, would prohibit drivers younger than 18 from using cell phones while driving. Ortiz’s bill passed in the state House and is now before the state Senate.

In The News: Texas Teen Driver Crackdown on Cell Phone Use

Cool Stuff: EasyView Bluetooth Wireless Hands-Free Car Kit by Canada Drive Safe

One of our top of the line bluetooth handsfree kits we sell for the vehicle, no installation is necassary and its a breeze to set up. Top features include Caller ID, 10hr talk talk, 2 weeks standby, easy charging, easy mounting, easy set-up.

Available through www.CanadaDriveSafe.com


Friday, May 15, 2009

In The News: Cell Phone Ban Means Safer Roads




Talking on Blackberrys or shuffling through iPods will have to take a backseat to driving, under Ontario’s new distracted drivers law.

The legislation, passed last week, prohibits the use of handheld cell phones and entertainment devices as well as other communication devices while driving.

"Cell phones, Blackberrys, and other devices that distract drivers attention are a serious threat to the safety of drivers on the roadway,” said Sergeant Steve MacDonald of the Halton Regional Police's District Response Unit.

"These new traffic laws are a welcome piece of legislation adding one more tool for our officers to improve road safety."

Drivers could face up to $500 in fines if they text, email, dial or talk on a hand held device once the legislation is put into effect this fall. In some cases, drivers can be charged under existing careless and dangerous driving laws if other drivers are placed at risk.

There are some acceptable methods to use cell phones and other devices while behind the wheel.
Drivers can use a cell phone with an earpiece, a headset or plugged into the vehicles sound system. They can place calls by using voice dialling.

A global positioning system is permitted when mounted to the dashboard or any other accessible place in the vehicle. A portable media player can be used when plugged into a vehicle's sound system.

According to Transport Canada, driver distraction is a contributing factor in about 20 per cent of all collisions and drivers who use cell phones are four times more likely to be in a crash.

“Accidents can cause substantial injury and they can cause a lot of damage to cars,” said Oakville MPP Kevin Flynn. “If it is going to help make our highways a safer place, it’s got to be a great piece of legislation.”

In 2006, Kevin Flynn introduced a private member's bill that proposed the prohibition of handheld devices among novice drivers. He said that it may have started the ball rolling on this universal ban.
“It allowed organizations like the CAA to come forward and make their case,” said Flynn. “I think it took a lot of the emotion out of the debate and it allowed for some hard facts to be introduced and the evidence is overwhelmingly in support of the bill.”

The Ontario Medical Association commended the provincial government for championing the bill.
According to an OMA report released last September, a crash is four times more likely to occur if a cell phone has been used up to ten minutes prior to a collision.

"There are enough distractions inside and outside the car without drivers focusing on the myriad of communication devices," said MacDonald.

Drivers can still use their cell phones to make emergency calls to police, fire and emergency medical services.

For more information regarding Bill 118: Countering Distracted Driving and promoting Green Transportation Act, 2009, visit www.ontla.on.ca.

Cool Stuff: Vent Mount Holder



For more information, on this product you can go to CanadaDriveSafe.com

In The News: Texas House OK's Bills To Ban Cell Phone Use While Driving

For those who just can’t seem to put down one modern gadget while driving, there’s some bad news: Two bills circulating in the Texas legislature want drivers to put their cell phone down and put both hands on the wheel.

"I've seen people speeding through school zones, if they're on their phone, they're a little less careful with kids around,” said Nicole Robles, from west El Paso.

"It's not a big problem. I think people have become accustomed to the modern convenience of having a cell phone,” said central El Paso resident, Jesus Vasquez.

But lawmakers and some El Pasoans said it's the modern convenience of talking on the cell phone and sending text messages while driving that jeopardizes people's lives. Robles told KFOX she fears for the little ones in her family, after some close calls. "I'm a little scared,” said Robles. “I always walk them to school just to make sure they get there safe, but I've seen some kids get close to getting hit.”

That's why lawmakers have tentatively approved banning the use of hand-held cell phones for all drivers in active school zones. They've also authorized banning teens under the age of 18 from using a cell phone while driving, even if it's hands-free. "They're barely starting to drive and they get a little bit nervous, so with a cell phone it would make it worse,” said Carlos Reyes of west El Paso.

Both bills have an exception -- and it's not allowing drivers to call their employer if they're running late, but the ability to use the phone for emergencies. In school zones, a sign would have to be posted warning drivers that cell phone use was prohibited at certain times.

"I rather have the ban because it's just protecting them; it's protecting our kids,” added Robles.

Recently, eastside city representative Rachel Quintana proposed the measure as a municipal ordinance. While some El Pasoans like the idea, others argue against the proposed law.

"We don't need a new law to tell people, it's seems more like common sense. I think it's kind of pointless,” said Vasquez.

If the Senate and the Governor approve this legislation those caught using a phone in an active school zone would have to pay a maximum fine of $25 for the first time and $50 for subsequent offenses.

There is no word on how much teens would be fined if they're caught using a cell phone on the road -- but the penalty wouldn't go on their record.

USA Cellphone Ban Breakdown


USA states breakdown

State Banned? Notes
Alabama No
Alaska No
Arkansas Partial School bus drivers are banned from using a cell phone. Ban on drivers under 18yrs proposed.
Arizona Partial A bill to introduce a ban was lost by a 4-3 vote in the Senate Transportation Committee. Bus drivers are banned from using a cell phone
California Yes Beginning July 1, 2008, violators face a US$20 fine for a first offense and a US$50 ticket for subsequent infractions. Law passed Sept 2007 bans all under-18s from using a phone at all, even with handsfree kit. Text messaging while driving (inc emails) banned with effect from Jan 1st 2009.
Colorado No Teens with restricted licenses are banned - but can only be stopped for another violation first
Connecticut Yes Banned with effect from Oct. 2005 - teens are also forbidden from using handsfree kits while moving
Delaware No A driver can already be prosecuted for "inattentive driving" - which can include using a cell phone. Studies into the issue have been requested
District of Columbia Yes Banned from July 2004
Florida Partial State Attorney General said that cities can set local regulations - July 2001. Overturned by Governor Bush..
Georgia Partial School bus drivers banned from using cell phones while driving. DeKalb County has fines when crashes can be attributed to driving while using a cellphone.
Hawaii Being debated A bill has been introduced in Hawaii's legislature by Sen. Joseph Souki, D-Wailuku-Waiehu.
Idaho No
Illinois Partial School bus drivers are banned - Chicago and Gary City Council have passed local laws banning driving without a hands-free kit.
Indiana No Ban proposed by State Sen. Rose Antich Carr - Jan 2004
Iowa Being debated
Kansas No Bill to introduce ban failed in 2000
Kentucky No
Louisiana Partial Teenagers and new drivers are banned - all drivers banned from text messaging only.
Maine Partial Minors and those on learner driving licenses may not use a cell phone while driving
Maryland No Bill to ban dropped Feb. 2001. New proposal in the House, proposed by Delegates Arnick and Mandel
Massachusetts Partial Bill for most users pending - but bus drivers already banned. Drivers required to keep at least one hand on the steering wheel while holding a phone.
Michigan No
Minnesota Partial Teenagers and provisional drivers are banned - $100 fine plus delays in license upgrades for offenders
Mississippi No Legislation prevents local councils enacting their own ban.
Missouri No
Montana No
Nebraska No Bill planned by State Sen. Jim Cudaback - Jan 2004
Nevada No State bill to introduce ban failed April 1999. Local bill in Clark County also blocked Nov. 2001. Nevada state passed bill banning local regulations, March 2003.
New Hampshire Partial Not explicitly banned, but you can be prosecuted if using a cellphone when involved in an driving accident.
New Jersey Yes Banned from 2004, updated from March 2008 - fine US$100. Bill extended June 2008 to include text messaging.
New Mexico Partial Being debated - local ban in the cities of Santa Fe, Albuquerque, Taos, and Las Vegas
New York Yes Ban effective from Nov. 2001
North Carolina Being debated Study into the effects of cell phone usage while driving being carried out.
North Dakota Being debated Bill proposed by Sen. Harvey Tallackson, D-Grafton, Feb 2005
Ohio Partial The City of Cleveland is discussing a ban. Ban in place in Brooklyn.
Oklahoma No Bill to introduce ban failed in May 1999. Legislation prevents local councils enacting their own ban.
Oregon Partial Ban applies to teenagers only.
Pennsylvania Partial Local cities have their own laws - state legislation pending
Rhode Island No Governor Almond rejected a ban - July 2001. School buses are banned from using a cell phone. Proposal for a ban being debated, April 2004.
South Carolina Partial Bill to ban holders of a beginner's permit, conditional or special restricted driver's license passed by House committee, April 2008
South Dakota No
Tennessee Partial School buses are banned from using a cell phone
Texas No Senate Bill 154 proposed. If passed would come into effect from 2008. A previous attempt in 2005 failed
Utah No Bill to introduce ban failed March 1998. Highland city planning a ban - Feb 2005
Vermont No
Virginia Partial Bill banning minors passed Jan 2005. Bill banning 16-17yr olds with conditional licenses passed March 2007
Washington Yes Ban imposed, to come into effect from July 2008. Driving while sending text messages separately banned with effect from Jan 1st 2008
West Virginia No Bill proposed in 1999, but never debated
Wisconsin No Bill to introduce ban failed in April 1998. Bill to ban younger drivers only being debated.
Wyoming No Bill proposed by Rep. Floyd Esquibel but not debated

In The News: New MBTA cell phone ban also tightens rules for commuter rail

BOSTON - The MBTA’s new cell phone ban replaces a less restrictive one that has long applied to commuter rail operations.
A spokesman for the Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Co. said Thursday it has prohibited its engineers and conductors from doing their jobs while using or carrying a cell phone.
But Scott Farmelant (FAR’-muh-lant) says the workers used to be able to carry their phone in a bag with other personal belongings. The device had to be switched off.
MBTA subway, bus and rail drivers who are now caught using a cell phone face a 30-day suspension and recommendation for termination. Those caught carrying a phone get a 10-day suspension on the first offense, and a 30-day suspension and recommendation for termination for a second offense.